X thread 1897429800710758413
Source: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429800710758413 Captured: 2026-06-19T22:10:35.019Z Tweets captured: 31
Top-level tweet: 1897429800710758413
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:31.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429800710758413
The Famulare family COVID saga continues. Up today: rebound š¤¬
https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1895616959083053369ā¦
With my wife Marisaās consent, here is our estimated nose/throat viral load history relative to peak since I first tested positive on day 2 of my symptoms. Weāre both experiencing rebound!
Media:

Reply: 1897429818641408078
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:35.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429818641408078
Hereās the same with log10-y. So yeah, weāve both rebounded. I took paxlovid days 3-7 (and have been on metformin since day 2). My load crashed by day 7 and went negative days 9 and 10. Marisa hasnāt had any treatments, and never went negative, but 10-fold rebound regardless.
Media:

Reply: 1897429831798895063
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:39.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429831798895063
BTW I described how to turn rapid test color into a quantitative assay here https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1894899637217304636ā¦, and hereās the code and data https://github.com/famulare/famulare.github.io/tree/master/assets/2025-02-26-My-First-COVID-Infectionā¦.
Reply: 1897429843756900566
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:41.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429843756900566
First, itās annoying! Weāre very ready to be done. Weāre tired of not having Marisaās parents visit. Of masking around our toddler (who hasnāt caught it yet, as far as tests and symptoms say). Of runny noses. Of being tired. And Marisa, who has had it worse, is tired of coughing!
Reply: 1897429855555457307
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:44.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429855555457307
But, because at least itās fascinating, Iāve been doing a lot of rapid tests on interesting samples on myself. So letās get into some interesting stuff.
Reply: 1897429867341472210
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:47.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429867341472210
I tested on day 11 after testing negative twice because I noticed my nose was running just a little bit more and I was a bit more tired than the day before, and I was curious about rebound. Sure enough, I got a very faint positive.
Reply: 1897429878913602036
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:50.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429878913602036
That night, I was visited by GI distress! This is not a big surprise as we know COVID is shed in stool and can settle in the gut for the long haul, especially in someone like me who takes a B-cell-depleting therapy for MS and canāt make new antibodies.
Reply: 1897429890473058429
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:53.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429890473058429
That said, Iāve tried three different approaches to get a fecal rapid test, but all have been negative. But I canāt be sure if the virus isnāt there or the tests donāt work with that mediumā¦
Reply: 1897429902091280806
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:55.000Z
-
URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429902091280806
- first try: sample probably too acidic: got weird transient positives on flu B and rsv but always covid-neg
- second: swab of solids, one minute in buffer, covid-negative
- third, swab of toilet water + solids, 5 minutes in buffer, covid-negative
@SolidEvidence thoughts?
Reply: 1897429919355035898
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:31:59.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429919355035898
So anyway, stool sampling with rapid tests has been a letdown, but mask, hepa, nose, and throat sampling have been interesting! Hereās a panel of days I tested samples from sites other than combined nose-throat. Y-axis is est. viral load relative to nose-throat day 2 (peak).
Media:

Reply: 1897429932646785186
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:03.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429932646785186
First up, masks. tl;dr: mask and nose viral load tell different stories over time! And Iām very likely a lot less infectious via the air now than at the start.
Reply: 1897429944441168095
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:05.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429944441168095
As discussed here, on day 2, I was able to pull virus off a mask worn for an hour https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1893095652462338263ā¦. In front of the mouth was highest viral load, with a very little but non-zero positive away from the mouth. (Wasnāt negative like I originally said.)
Reply: 1897429962405372050
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:10.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429962405372050
Overnight from day 2 to day 3, I was able to pull virus off a mask put inside my bedside hepa filter, showing that SARS-CoV-2 was travelling on fine aerosols. You see that quantified here, as the day 3 hepa measurement.
Media:

Reply: 1897429975684501746
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:13.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429975684501746
On day 8, my nose-throat viral load dropped by a factor of 1000, give or take, and my mask sample was negative, despite wearing it for 11 hours. So good, nose way down, aerosol negative.
Reply: 1897429993745199245
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:17.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897429993745199245
But, on day 12, my nose/throat sample is hot a hell again! Dammit, how infectious am I???
I wore a clean mask for 4.25 hours, through work, talking, singning Moo Baa Fa La La to my daughter, etc. Tested the mask. It was barely positiveāat the limit of detection but itās there.
Media:

Reply: 1897430006906945642
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:20.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897430006906945642
But quantitatively, while my nose swab viral load on day 12 was about ~1/2 of the value on day 2 (so basically the same), the mask viral load is at least 500x lower! Overnight hepa was negative. This is great! There was very likely zero SARS-CoV-2 in my lungs last night.
Reply: 1897430018718097910
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:23.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897430018718097910
Even more interestingly, I tested nose and throat independently, instead of with a combined swab. Nose is strongly positive, almost exactly the same test-line-contrast-adjusted level as the nose-throad swab earlier that day. And the throat-only swab was negative.
Reply: 1897430030348923282
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:26.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897430030348923282
Throat-only negative. Mask barely barely positive. Nose hot as hell. So?
Itās very likely Iāve got no infectious breath, no infectious spit, but very infectious snot. My only symptoms right now are fading GI, and one stuffy nostril.
NOW I STILL BETTER KEEP WASHING MY HANDS š
Reply: 1897430042038452338
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:29.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897430042038452338
So anyway, thereās what I hope is a fascinating look into a single infection history, so far. Iām disappointed the stool tests are negative, but, as my symptoms calm down, I hope itās because thereās very little virus there. I also really hope my wife and I clear this thing soon.
Reply: 1897430054050963658
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:32.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897430054050963658
Until then, Iāll let you know if anything else interesting comes up. Thanks for reading along!
Reply: 1897430065677479993
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:32:34.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897430065677479993
You can read the unrolled version of this thread here:
Reply: 1897434076581372247
- Author: The Education of O @Ed_of_O
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:48:31.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/Ed_of_O/status/1897434076581372247
Could you also put the days using Paxlovid on this chart?
Did you stop taking it before the rebound? I donāt know why we still donāt give 10 day prescriptions for it other than Pfizer charging $300/day.
Reply: 1897435980015321371
- Author: Jeff @SEAsheltie
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:56:04.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/SEAsheltie/status/1897435980015321371
Oof. We got nasty rebound cases too, and we also used Paxlovid. Iām not sure about the level of experimental evidence to back it up but my strong hunch is that Paxlovid causes the rebound.
Reply: 1897436010059063614
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:56:12.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897436010059063614
Here ya go. Yeah, 10 days should be standard now. I ran out after d7, still slightly positive. Since I donāt make antibodies at the moment (no b-cells), Iām not surprised it came back. I hope the t-cells clear it out soon. I feel worse for Marisa, who had no reason to expect it!
Media:

Reply: 1897436156243190261
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:56:46.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897436156243190261
It seems rebound is pretty common (~15%) with or without pax, but most people donāt look. Annoying regardless!
Reply: 1897436700227592567
- Author: Jeff @SEAsheltie
- Time: 2025-03-05T23:58:56.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/SEAsheltie/status/1897436700227592567
Yeah I do wonder how much spread has occurred because people refused to keep testing and brushed off the rebound as allergies.
Now Iām curious if other respiratory viruses get rebound. I donāt recall ever getting it with the flu or colds.
Reply: 1897463412176904447
- Author: The Education of O @Ed_of_O
- Time: 2025-03-06T01:45:05.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/Ed_of_O/status/1897463412176904447
I assume she also had a rebound after similar Paxlovid treatment but not immunocompromised?
I wonder if anyone has tried half a dose for 10 days⦠The coatings donāt look to be anything special where cutting would change the pharmacokinetics much.
š you both clear it soon.
Media:

Reply: 1897473917071335680
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-06T02:26:49.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897473917071335680
No pax for the missus. Iirc rebound is common enough around 16āt% with/without, when people bother to look. But Iām too lazy to find the paper at the moment.
You def could split the pills. But perhaps unwise for an antiviral?
Reply: 1897489866931453995
- Author: The Education of O @Ed_of_O
- Time: 2025-03-06T03:30:12.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/Ed_of_O/status/1897489866931453995
Unclear! Havenāt found any low dose study for acute infection >5 days or for mild infections
Thereās one for hospitalized patients w/moderate renal impairment who got ½ dose for 5 days & those w/mild to no impairment who got a normal dose
Little diff? https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354223001377ā¦
Media:

Reply: 1897493136789901331
- Author: The Education of O @Ed_of_O
- Time: 2025-03-06T03:43:12.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/Ed_of_O/status/1897493136789901331
One more caveat.
Ritonavir dose isnāt cut and nirmatrelvir is only cut for stage 3 kidney disease
But we can compare hospitalized patients with little kidney disease and a full dose to moderate disease at a half dose of nirmatrelvir. Difference may be mostly insignificant there
Media:

Reply: 1897500395473396134
- Author: Mike Famulare @famulare_mike
- Time: 2025-03-06T04:12:02.000Z
- URL: https://x.com/famulare_mike/status/1897500395473396134
Good refs, thanks! Although I suppose the biggest takeaway is how little pax does for clearance regardless. Good reminder me and Marisa are still solidly within the distribution.